3/18/2023 0 Comments Word vs word accident![]() ![]() 8- 14 Counter to the proponents argument that the vast majority of injuries and their precipitating events are predictable and preventable, opponents state that removing the word accident inappropriately takes that argument from “vast majority” to “all.” 1, 14- 14 Yet, on June 8, 1997, the U.S. While proponents for ceasing the use of accident argued the word conjured up connotations of fate and acts of God, opponents argued the push for the word’s removal was irrational, would alienate the public, and was a form of censorship imposed by a group with one narrow viewpoint. The volume of writings on the use of accident exploded in the 1990’s, characterized by heavy debate over the terminology. 7 The most comprehensive article on the issue to date addressed the fact that accident and injury were used interchangeably, and used in inconsistent ways. ![]() The confusion surrounding the use of the term accident was then highlighted in a paper in 1988. 6 Both Doege and Rutherford were rather brief in their arguments, yet their statements did draw attention to the topic. Injury and trauma were instead offered as replacements for the word accident. This characteristic therefore made accident inappropriate in the healthcare arena. 6 Despite ordinary and medical dictionaries of the time merely defining accident as anything happening by chance, Rutherford pointed out that there was, at least in the context of healthcare, an insinuation of injury. In 1986, however, the term accident was again criticized. 5 Initially, little resulted from Doege’s argument. Instead, the word injury was actually suggested as a replacement for the word accident. 5 Doege made the argument that injury is not the result of an accident because this suggests it is a random act, attributable to chance, and lacks fault. The contemporary argument over the appropriateness of using the term accident in scientific works began in 1978 when its use was formally called into question for the first time. Yet these analyses were not born out of a question over vernacular, but instead aimed at converting it from an everyday common-sense term to a scientific construct. 2 Subsequent analyses of “accident proneness” and “accident phenomenon”, in 14, and 1983 2 started to address issues of expectedness, avoid-ability, and intention. For nearly a century, there has been at least some acknowledgement of the confusion surrounding the term accident, with perhaps the first concept analysis on “accident proneness” being conducted in 1919. ![]() ![]() There is a need for a present-day conceptual analysis to clarify these inconsistencies.Īccident is a term that has long been used, both colloquially and professionally. Since accident continues to pervade present writings, and is often used the same way as crash, the question begs whether there is a different meaning behind these two words, or whether the two words have come to essentially represent the same idea. The term crash is not the focus of this conceptual analysis however, as it is often used interchangeably, it should be noted that its conceptual meaning has never officially been called into question. And while accident was the subject of conceptual analyses well before the extensive debate, interestingly, a modern conceptual analysis was not revisited during or after all the attention. The suggestion was a different word should be used to indicate a preventable event. The message, both implied and formally stated, was that accident suggests the event is as a result of chance, and therefore not preventable. This scrutiny of the language, primarily argued in 1990’s and late 2000’s, drew attention to the conceptual confusion over the usage of the word accident in the trauma literature. This inconsistency is surprising considering the heavy debate that has taken place regarding the appropriate terminology. In the current literature, crash and accident are both frequently used, and sometimes noticeably used interchangeably. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |